Welcome
 
 


Upcoming Meetings



2012 Annual Meeting
July 28-August 4, 2012
The Fairmont Chateau Whistler
Whistler, Canada

LMC & Graduate Program
June 10-14, 2012
Emory University Conference Center
Atlanta, GA

Corporate Counsel Symposium
September 12-14, 2012
Four Seasons Hotel
Philadelphia, PA

FDCC Presents

New FDCC Members
Quarterly Vol. 62.2
FDCC's Blog-The Federation Forum
FDCC Declared Candidates for Election

Federation Forum

  • 05/15/2012

    Part 8-What I've Learned

    Posted by: Francisco Ramos

    71. Boring gets a bad rap.  Boring is playing by the rules, sticking to the fundamentals and working hard. If you’re called “boring,” take it as a complement. “Boring” is a term often tossed around by those whom

    ...
  • 05/10/2012

    Locomotive Inspection Act Pre-empts State Tort Law Claims

    Posted by: Marisa Trasatti

    In Kurns v. R.R. Friction Prods. Corp., 132 S. Ct. 1261 (2012), the Supreme Court considered whether Federal railroad safety laws pre-empted a rail worker from suing a railroad parts manufacturer under a more protective state regulation for his

    ...
  • 05/09/2012

    Part 7-What I've Learned

    Posted by: Francisco Ramos

    61.  Send the judge a courtesy copy of your motionand a copy of the cases you cited and bring an extra copy to the hearing. Bring a blank order and don’t leave the judge’s chambers until you have hashed out the language of the

    ...
  • 05/01/2012

    Part 6-What I've Learned

    Posted by: Francisco Ramos

    51.  Everyone has his own way of doing things.  When serving the needs of a client, partner or judge, serve his needs, not some generic recipient of your services.  To do that, get to know your recipient – what he likes

    ...
  • 04/25/2012

    Part 5-What I have Learned

    Posted by: Francisco Ramos

    41.  Have a theme for your life.  What are you trying to accomplish?  When it’s all said and done, and your career is over, what do you hope to have done with your life?  Don’t settle for figuring out what your

    ...

Article Of The Month

This month's article is entitled  "Damage Allocation between Additional Insured Insurers and Direct Insurers" by Anita G. Fox. Read more...

 


Reference Desk

Our members have authored thousands of papers covering a wide variety of areas on defense related issues. Enter a key word or phrase to find a publication on a specific issue.

Keyword:  

 

Find A Defense Attorney


Hot Cases

  • 05/11/2012

    Teresa Soppet v. Enhanced Recovery

    The district court judge certified the issue of whether a consent to receive automated calls on a cell phone continues after the phone number is assigned to a new party.
    United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit
  • 05/10/2012

    Pacific Pictures v USDC-Cala

    Pacific Pictures filed a petition for a writ of mandamus, attempting to overturn an order finding that Pacific’s attorney waived the attorney-client privilege.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
  • 05/08/2012

    Insurance Company of the West v. Island Dream Homes, Inc.

    Insurance Company, an insurer of a condominium, appealed a judgment as a matter of law under in favor of Island Dream in an action that alleged Island Dream’s negligence in conducting roof repairs caused a large stone veneer wall to fall and damage the condominium.
    United States Court of Appeals for Eleventh Circuit
  • 05/07/2012

    Payton v. Astrue

    Payton appealed a denial of disability insurance benefits.
    United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
  • 05/04/2012

    Thorpe v. Ted Bowling Construction

    Thorpe, a claimant for Workers’ Compensation benefits appealed her award, arguing that the Workers’ Compensation Commission (WCC) incorrectly determined that amount of benefits she was entitled too.
    Supreme Court of Virginia
  • 05/03/2012

    Gilbert v. Residential Funding LLC

    In a suit alleging that the defendants violated various consumer protection laws in connection with a residential mortgage, the district court's grant of the defendants' motion to dismiss is reversed in part,
    United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
  • 05/03/2012

    Estate of Morgens v. Comm'r of Internal Revenue

    Mrs. Morgens paid the gift tax on the § 2519 deemed transfers of the Residual Trusts and that her estate should be increased under the gross-up rule of § 2035(b) by the value of the gift taxes paid.
    United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
  • 05/02/2012

    Evelyn Grier, as the appointed Personal Representative of the Estate of Willie James Fee, deceased, Appellant, v. AMISUB of South Carolina, Inc., d/b/a Piedmont Medical Center, Respondent.

    An expert affidavit in a medical malpractice case does not have to contain an opinion as to proximate cause.
    Supreme Court of South Carolina
  • 05/02/2012

    Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.,

    Jury award of $26.01 million in a case where the plaintiff developed a hypersensitivity reaction called Stevens–Johnson Syndrome after taking a non steroidal anti-inflamatory drug for shoulder pain was affirmed.
    First Circuit Court of Appeals
  • 05/01/2012

    CASEY v. MERCK CO INC

    Virginia recognizes neither equitable nor statutory tolling due to the pendency of a putative class action in another jurisdiction.
    United States Court of Appeals,Second Circuit
  • 05/01/2012

    In re Federal-Mogul Global Inc.,

    Federal–Mogul Global and its affiliates filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy and sought to resolve asbestos-related liability through the creation of a personal-injury trust under 11 U.S.C. § 524(g), the Court found that the transfer to this trust did not violate the anti- assignment provisions of the Insurance policies.
    Third Circuit Court of Appeals l
  • 05/01/2012

    Valero v. Bd. of Retirement Tulare County

    Valero appealed an order from the Superior Court, denying his request for an administrative writ of mandate directing the Board to grant him a service connected disability retirement.
    Court of Appeals of California
  • 04/27/2012

    WURZEL V. WHIRLPOOL CORP.

    Summary judgment upheld for Whirlpool in employment discrimination case
    United States Court of Appeals for Sixth Circuit
  • 04/26/2012

    Eads v. Borman

    Eads sought review of an order from the Oregon Court of Appeals, which upheld an award of summary judgment to an LLC in an action for medical malpractice based on a theory of apparent agency.
    Supreme Court of Oregon
  • 04/26/2012

    MERCHANT V. BAUER

    Denial of police officer’s motion for summary judgment for qualified immunity upheld
    United States Court of Appeals for Fourth Circuit
  • 04/26/2012

    ALMY V. SEBELIUS

    Medicare Appeals Council refusal to provide Medicare Part B coverage for knee osteoarthritis device upheld
    United States Court of Appeals for Fourth Circuit
  • 04/26/2012

    CROWLEY V. NEVADA

    Help America Vote Act does not create private right of action under section 1983
    United States Court of Appeals for Ninth Circuit
  • 04/24/2012

    IN RE LUPRON MARKETING AND SALES PRACTICES LITIGATION

    Distribution of cy pres fund affirmed
    United States Court of Appeals for First Circuit
  • 04/23/2012

    LANDMARK SCREENS, LLC V. MORGAN, LEWIS & BOCKIUS, LLP

    Summary judgment for defendant law firm reversed in state law fraud claim
    United States Federal Circuit
  • 04/23/2012

    ANAGO FRANCHISING, INC. V. SHAZ, LLC

    Settlement properly effected by filing stipulation under FRCP 41
    United States Court of Appeals for Eleventh Circuit
  • 04/20/2012

    PERCY GREEN V. PAUL NOCCIERO, SECRETARY OF THE BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS, ET. AL.

    Police officers granted qualified immunity
    United States Court of Appeals for Eighth Circuit
  • 04/20/2012

    MARC BROWN V. CONCORD GROUP INSURANCE COMPANY

    Supreme Court of New Hampshire Interprets “Your Work” Exclusion in Insurance Coverage Action
    Supreme Court of New Hampshire
  • 04/20/2012

    HANDRON V. SECRETARY OF DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES

    Denial of Defendant’s attorney’s fees affirmed
    United States Court of Appeals for Third Circuit
  • 04/20/2012

    AES Corporation v. Steadfast Insurance Co.

    AES appealed a judgment which entered a declaration that a civil complaint filed against AES did not allege an “occurrence,” as that term was defined in an insurance policy with the insurer, such that Steadfast did not owe the AES defense or liability coverage.
    Supreme Court of Virginia
  • 04/19/2012

    JASON MILLER V. CHASE HOME FINANCE, LLC

    No private cause of action provided by HAMP
    United States Court of Appeals for Eleventh Circuit
  • 04/18/2012

    CORNELIUS V. NATIONAL CASUALTY COMPANY

    Uninsured Motorist Coverage Available to Employee Using Bucket Truck to Work on Elevated Power Lines
    Supreme Court of South Dakota
  • 04/17/2012

    POUNDERS V. ENSERCH E&C, INC., ET AL.

    Arizona Court of Appeals Applies New Mexico Statute of Repose in Asbestos Lawsuit
    State of Arizona, Court of Appeals, Division One
  • 04/17/2012

    USPPS, LTD. V. AVERY DENNISON CORP.

    Complaint against law firm for breach of fiduciary duty dismissed for failure to comply with statute of limitations
    United States Federal Circuit
  • 04/16/2012

    HASSLER V. ACCOUNT BROKERS OF LARIMER COUNTY, INC.

    Statute of Limitations Bars Plaintiff From Recovering Deficiency Following Repossession and Sale of Vehicle
    Supreme Court of Colorado
  • 04/16/2012

    GRADE V. BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY

    2007 Amendments to the Federal Railway Safety Act did not Overrule Supreme Court’s Holding in Shanklin
    United States Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
  • 04/13/2012

    HALL V. JENNIE EDMUNDSON MEMORIAL HOSPITAL, ET AL

    The Supreme Court of Iowa Applies Layperson Standard of Care to Hospital’s Decision to Credential Surgeon
    Supreme Court of Iowa
  • 04/13/2012

    WALSH V. ADVANCED CARDIAC SPECIALISTS

    Arizona Juries May Award No Compensation to Successful Plaintiff in Wrongful Death Case
    Supreme Court of Arizona
  • 04/09/2012

    L.A. Printex Industries, Inc. v. Aeropostale, Inc.

    L.A. Printex sued Aeropostale for copyright infringement. The district court granted Aeropostale’s motion for summary judgment and denied L.A. Printex’s motion. L.A. PRintex appealed.
    United States Court of Appeals – Ninth Circuit
  • 05/12/2011

    Ryerson, Inc. v Federal Insurance Company

    Liability insurance policy does not cover refund to a purchaser of subsidiaries to settle fraud claims.
    United States Court of Appeals – Seventh Circuit

In The News

Virginia Easley Johnson participates in a service trip to Guatemala . Read more...
 

Federation Triumphs

 

John R. Mitchell., successfully obtains a not-guilty verdict for his client.  Read more...

Member Profile

  FEATURED
  MEMBER


  Oscar Shub
 
Read more...

 

Legal News Feed

 
Username:
Password:
Forgotten Password? Click Here.

Member Login